Hmm, weird that a tribe that knew about the war beforehand has the early advantage; while the tribe that thought it was allied with the other when the first attacks flew hasn't caught up yet.
Oh Nevermind that is not weird, it's 'manipulatative diplomacy' also known as backstabbing.
Now before you say that there was no backstabbing, think about it. Just because no one thinks that they are the bad guy, doesnt mean that you are in the right.
Junk (well, Sweeney anyway) Convinced 404 that diplomacy was, if not yet an alliance, then currently a pact of NON AGRESSION and soon to be upgraded to an alliance. <-- AFAIK that part is indisputable.
Now, logic dictates that before one can honorably fight another when there is at least the illusion of diplomacy, there must be a time cushion between NAP and war.
Regardless this is just a game. There is no need to insult people, say that they are "crying".
Getting into an argument on a forum such as this is pure childishness.
Either admit your wrongs or don't. It is no concern of mine. However if you could just pretend to be decent human beings I'm sure everyone would be much happier.
Thanks,
-thedog