Correct me if I'm wrong -- The slow death of Tribalwars

Sweeney

Royal Guardian W17
Reaction score
42
>complain about how the game is dying
>get the rank 1, rank 2 and rank 3 tribe to all hug together

genius-008.jpg
 

DeletedUser6081

Guest
3) Personally, I know how much you afraid of WHY, due to you having more players, more villages, more points, you still trying to turn everyone vs WHY... You asked for NAP with tribes that I am part of, and main speculation was that our NAP will least until WHY is gone. In one week you drop NAP (WHY is still around) because you felt like we didn;t do anything against WHY. There were no speculation of starting offense against WHY. What my family tribes doing and who we are attacking and warring is none of your business. NAP was set and you broke it just because you felt like that. How do you want me to respect you as a leader because all of your diplomatic moves based on what YOU wand and how YOU feel. Strong leader and diplomat do not set/break diplo relationship just because he wants to or feel some way. We had agreement and you did not kept your word.


Big surprise, guess who has a NAP with learn again.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I think you pesky Why? players are missing the whole point of this thread. 152 players working together against 23 is not unfair, it is not killing this war game! What is killing this war game is the 11 (yes I counted them) players in Why? that have played together previously. How dare they think this is acceptable?! The other 12 that have no history with them are just idiots to think that they will get anywhere playing alongside these game killers. Thankfully the brave and respected Learn, -A-, -=A=-. Spank, SpankD coalition are here to show them the error of their ways!
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
Since no one in -A- answered you guys....

I don't like this hugging against 1 tribe.I don't like diplomacy in general actually, a little bit is fine, but what is going on in w32 right now is too much.
You're right to be pissed.But also, when a tribe is attacked by another tribe, it's only normal that they will retaliate somehow.Why has been attacking -A-.It's true, the nicest thing to do was keep this a 1v1 or max 1v2 because -A- and Spank are a family.

But what did Why? expect to happen?Learn was obviously against Why? from the start and with the threat of Learn coming from k55, Why? is asking for a fight in k54.Why? knew this would happen.You can't attack someone and not expect them to use diplomacy in their favor if they can.The smartest play for Why? would have been fighting Learn 1v1 imo.You guys refused to have your 1v1 with Learn.It's like you wanted it to be a 1 vs....many.Most of the why members had my respect already but I respect them even more now for their decision.But you can't complain on the external about it.You can't declare, even though not officially, war to 10 tribes and then complain that 10 tribes are fighting you.
 

DeletedUser6081

Guest
I'm sure a 1v1 with learn would have been fine if -A- wouldnt have tried mass recruiting in our backline.

In my opinion the hugging between -A- and spank is uncalled for. Bottom line, it's just unnecessary. There are over 100 player jammed right next to eachother with nothing to noble but barbs.

Also, we didn't pick a fight with spank. They joined in on the hug fest willingly. It's disgusting.

I'm not sure what any player hopes to gain from being in these tribes

Growth will be restricted for these players, then barbs get nobled and farming is taken out of the picture so growth is hindered even more.

In the end, if these tribes end up dominating who actually wins? Only 35 can cross the finish line.

With over 100 members that's an awful lot of people who will either go inactive from boredom or will be betrayed and left out of the winning tribe.

This is how cowards play the game.
 

Im not Crazy Henkie.

Active Member
Reaction score
151
Hugging is the case on all worlds on US and even most why? Players have been in an extreme hug tribe before ;)

So yeah, it sucks but in general this whole server sucks

A 5man per tribe classic would be a nice way to solve this issue cause then you cant hug :D
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You're right to be pissed.
Not in the slightest, this is my favourite form of diplomacy...None! I just find it funny that Steve is trying to claim that Why? is killing the game by having the same players from every world. When it is in actual fact 11 players on this world that I counted.

I find it a huge compliment that he is so terrified of Why? that he's had to stoop this low.

-A- and Spank are a family.
So they're a 4 tribe family tribe? I wasn't aware of that, assumed it was just a nap. Huge kudos to all of the players in that family then! You bad boys are really showing the world how this game should be played :D

But you can't complain on the external about it.You can't declare, even though not officially, war to 10 tribes and then complain that 10 tribes are fighting you.
Not complaining, mocking.

I always assume that as soon as you create a tribe you are declaring war on the world. That's what this game is all about. 1 tribe can win the world, you pick your tribe and take out the rest....or am I missing the point?
 

Im not Crazy Henkie.

Active Member
Reaction score
151
A 5man wouldnt solve the issue, it would only make tribes having 10+ academies.

Edit: add no supporting outside tribe and it works fine

No support outside tribe is often a standard feature on the classic (all the ones I played had it at least) but yeah good to point it out a bit more clearly :)
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
5 man might be a bit too low.10 would be the ideal number imo.There would be plenty of academies anyway.But no support outside the tribe sucks.In the lategame, without support landing after your train, any village would be easily taken back by the defender.That would ruin the academies but it would also make nobling a decent enemy harder.
 

DeletedUser6081

Guest
But no support outside the tribe sucks.In the lategame, without support landing after your train, any village would be easily taken back by the defender.


You can still send support I think, but if it isnt a villa owned by you or a tribe mate it visits and comes back.

I may be wrong but that's how I think it works.
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
Nope, I've played a world with that setting and you couldn't launch support until the village was taken.
 

DeletedUser6081

Guest
Well maybe that is somthing to be altered for future worlds.

Because I would prefer the world have the setting where you cant support outside the tribe.

In the end it won't matter much though, people will just have 4 academy tribes.
 

DeletedUser6712

Guest
lol you are all too funny. Since I am duking -A- family I will reply on my diplomatic stands. First of all I have been gifted 2 tribes with full membership and lots of diplomacy. Lots of changes was put in place since there. I mean all of you are masters of showing your personal opinion but fill in someone else shoes and look on things from their perspective. You can all talk all you want but Dase already pointed out everything. Life is unfortunate and on this world 32 things got where they are by simply logical chain of events:
1. Spanks and A were ALLY for some time now and good luck trying to break it. Same as Why and Learn saw each other as competition. Same as PK has good diplo stands with both Learn and Why.
2. Why? keep eating A south players little bit by little bit which of course got our attention and make us organize diplo with Learn that will benefit both sides because we see Why? as competition on the map.
3. A is number 1 tribe on the paper but we all know what is what and who is who.

Current situation on the south side of the world should not be surprised for anyone.

To sweeney: yo bud. I wanted to work with you but somehow your very active account take sweet ass time to read my message and proposal while taking advantage of it. So I do not know what you have to say if you one who turn down diplomacy in first place. Best of luck now tho.

To Why? players: just quit bitching about hugging, you knew it was happening and you screwed up your own diplo or your diplomat was AFK or you had too big head or isnt hugging problem in every world or other 100 reasons . As soon as there is little of competition on the map and things start to get cloudy you guys like little girls come to external to scream 'they are hugging, they are hugging". There are lots of players in Why I truly admire but jezuz guys you do have skill and communication, apply it in the game not on the forum. Just like Ryan aka TheOne said to me in Skype "More noobs to eat" < love his attitude toward game. If you do not know how also please ask Rattlesnake how to keep cool and show top class of a player. Yeah it is might be 1000 to 1 but you should be proud of it and take it as challenge. No one said it will be easy.

Again, you pre-made tribe without full membership and academies. You guys did not really take advantage of diplomacy as a active tool of war. You guys got very skilled veterans of the game in 1 tribe. I am so sorry for making your life on this world little bit hard, again it was logical that hugging will be against you at least at this stage.

To all: Hug is great gift - one size fits all. After all why all of you worrying about our diplomatic stuff.

P.S. I did not hear any SPANK or A-team member coming to forum and bitching about current war that they have. Where one side represents our family tribes - 4 total, and our enemies got 8 total tribes (1 disband). Cause ain't small cry babies like some of you...
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I'm pretty sure this thread was started by one of your hug recipients to bitch at us, sorry that we responded.
 
Top