Your welcome, like I said, facts can't be denied.
Why not merge S.S and EGO? Then you would act like you're talking. Why isn't that happened? Why keep two separate tribes when you all "feel like one"?
And come on, you all know there are some players in EGO who don't like the cooperation with S.S because EGO should go for the new world order and be THE ONLY tribe left.
Glad I could contribute to your daily doses of laughs.
No, there are no players who think like that.
Now consider this: would you agree with my story if you just had made agreements with a tribe you're cooperating with?
No, of course not, you would shout this is a hoax, this is a lot of nonsense, you would even claim EGO and S.S are the best possible friends around, you would claim there never has been a better cooperation, unique on all the TW worlds, and so on.
I would do the same if I was you
The folks I'm talking about know who they are and that's enough for now.
EGO isn't called EGO for nothing. It gives them no chance to share their world domination. Especially with a (for EGO) insignificant size of 1/3 of EGO. Be realistic, high player and experienced EGO could crush the inexperienced S.S in a blink of an eye....
S.S has been a formidable ally. We wouldn't allow ourselves to even consider
attacking S.S. Not to mention they have quite a bit more skill than you give them credit for
.
Why haven't we merged S.S? Oh, I don't know...let's take a quick look at the member lists:
Ego404: 69 members
S.S: 70 members
70+69=139.
Even if we dropped all inactives and sits (some of whom are returning), I doubt we'd fall under the 60 member limit, reason being that S.S and us have
active players. I know this may be a shock to you, as you're probably in BJ and are unaccustomed to this, but the members of Ego404 and S.S actually
work together and
use their troops to fight wars in an
active way
.
Furthermore, S.S is a tribe entity in and of themselves. We share most forums as it is, run most everything by each other, but their leadership is separate. We prefer to keep it that way, as they've proven effective in that way. At the end of the world, when we know that we won't be making the same mistake BJ did (merging during a war, causing confusion/assimilation that takes time to solve), there may be a merge. I'm not the leader, but I know it has been discussed, I can't recall what was decided on. Does it matter? Nope. In the end, both Ego404 members and S.S members will be victorious in this world, and we have no intentions of destroying a good relation because of some ludicrous "New World Order" that doesn't exist. Why fix what isn't broken? Their leaders have done a magnificent job of creating a war machine that has taken on tribes and easily won time and time again, and we have no intention of having them drop sits/inactives that don't need to be dropped
now, solely to prove to some anonymous poster that we don't plan on warring them. It should be perfectly simple to
see that we have no plan to war them
ever. Again, why fix what isn't broken? If two musical notes go better together than separate, then why remove one completely? There is no point to it, and I can't stress that enough. We don't plan on
ever removing the musical note, because when we combine the two in the end, we know the symphony will be all the better for it
.
I'm glad you've given us so much fodder for jokes though, we like to have a good laugh in our shared forums.
