End Game

DeletedUser

Guest
It seems world has decided it will be 100% domination by one tribe for the win on this world....

So I have a few things I think should be required....(feel free to add if anyone thinks of anything)

1. Restarting or joining of this world is officially closed. (otherwise this will never end like w6)
2. A date or time when moral is no longer a factor
3. Somewhere we can keep track of what tribe owns what percent of world.
4. When will coins cost less
5. answer other common end game complaints before we start complaining!


lol but no seriously...
 

DeletedUser1180

Guest
Can we get some feedback on this? Or should he make a support ticket IG to get these settings implemented?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Oh yes would be nice if I could get some comments and concerns as well! (if people agree or disagree and so on)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
It seems world has decided it will be 100% domination by one tribe for the win on this world....

So I have a few things I think should be required....(feel free to add if anyone thinks of anything)

1. Restarting or joining of this world is officially closed. (otherwise this will never end like w6)
2. A date or time when moral is no longer a factor
3. Somewhere we can keep track of what tribe owns what percent of world.
4. When will coins cost less
5. answer other common end game complaints before we start complaining!


lol but no seriously...

I will determine at what point these things will (or will not) occur. When the points have been met, I will announce them. But since the largest tribe only owns 21% of the world, the end is so far away that it is not even worth considering at this point. You guys are welcome to discuss it for as long as you like, but I will not be announcing anything about any of these any time soon.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
ah ok :) anyone know what percent of world Drink and drank own together? 21% must be drink

so looking for a place where I could see that information for our tribal leadership usage. :)

oh found a part:
What is dominance?

Dominance is calculated as the percentage of player-owned villages belonging to a tribe. For example, if there are 100,000 player-owned villages in a world, and a tribe owns 50,000 of those villages, that tribe has 50% dominance.

Doing the math D/D owns roughly 40% of world. I understand Mods consider each tribe seperate so once D/D lose enough players to form 1 tribe it would appear that would be the time to reconsider these questions?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
No, it would not be time. I will only consider 1 tribe and since the two tribe cannot combine, they will either have to kill each other off or be killed off by someone else.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Okay We have a game plan now then, so thank you for your time!
 

DeletedUser3007

Guest
No, it would not be time. I will only consider 1 tribe and since the two tribe cannot combine, they will either have to kill each other off or be killed off by someone else.

AMEN!

so green what is your in game plan? hug the crap out of everyone and wait for them to quit so you can noble them?
is that how you plan to win your world? ;)
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
AMEN!

so green what is your in game plan? hug the crap out of everyone and wait for them to quit so you can noble them?
is that how you plan to win your world? ;)

I believe the intention is to steal your big wooden spoon and beat everyone to death with it. :p
 

DeletedUser3007

Guest
i dont get it... and nobody is stealing any spoons of mine! :mad:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Its our version of saying stirring the pot. Causing problems or creating chaos. The big wooden spoon.... Anyway No D/D are closed recruitment for the moment, permanently... Its us vs world, who ever challenges us first. like +/- may the rest in pieces :D
 

DeletedUser3662

Guest
AMEN!

so green what is your in game plan? hug the crap out of everyone and wait for them to quit so you can noble them?
is that how you plan to win your world? ;)

Probably DRINK/DRANK can hug you too ICE?

Check war stats. They tell everything. Any tribe who has went to war with DRINK/DRANK has been defeated.

Why? Because we hug everyone?

No, because we nuke everyone who stands on the way to our victory to the ground.

We have done "hugs" which are part of the game. We have diplomatic relationship wich are part of the game. After all thats why Allies status and NAP status exists on the diplomacy section.

Every tribe on the world has the right to make alliances/naps as it interests the best ... every tribe starts from the same point so why are we here top ranked?

Because we hug everyone? No, because we are better then everyone, because we have the most active members and whoever wants to prove me wrong lets try defeating us on war.
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
What RedAlert said is true,but a family tribe has the numbers advantage.So far no real challenge came.D/D is formed from the old drink family tribe,TBD and L, L.TBD was once dominating the world,D/D were also top 5 and l,l too.Merge,merge,merge.All the big tribes merged.That's why I didn't agree with how tbd was doing.And now what will it happen?Peopleerging accounts to end the world?Now that sucks,doesn't it?Why should there be things like this going on instead of pure war?Why was this alliance formed in the first place?I was expecting more from Kero to be honest.The ex TBD had the best team in the world at one point and now they have to think how to cut the members amount to win the world.


It's really not cool to see this happen.

I must say I never liked Clown,but looking at everyone else,I think they were the only ones who actually fought fair.Without families and stuff like that.And forget the hugging idea,isn't it more fun to win by fighting?Let's not consider that hugging is for noobs.But any way you look at it it's not fun.You want hugging?Play sims.


I think D/D should split into what used to be TBD and Drink and fight.


Don't take it personal guys,but you hugged more than you won wars.
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
I fail to see how a combination of D/D and TBD is more hugging than D/D, Clown and BASH plus a nap with L'l was. Oh yeah and +/- was in there as well then joined TBD while expecting to maintain a nap with D/D despite the state of war existing at that time.
Sure everyone fighting it out might have been better but Clown were never going to allow that. They were the ones who decided that getting multiple tribes to gang up on TBD was the way to go.
Incidentally we never merged L'l .... that was Clown. Later we took 3 of their members although only two stayed.
We could have gone the route of simply allying with D/D and maybe fighting later of course. In fact that was the original idea, the actions of certain players went a long way towards making us move onto the path we eventually chose. Sometimes you have to make compromises if it's to remain a game and not an unpaid job.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I feel all tingly inside. Know what that means? Somewhere, I don't know where though, a hug is taking place in this world.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Just an update... D/D now owns 46% of the world :D and we have less members... So still moving along nicely >:)
 

DeletedUser3007

Guest
Probably DRINK/DRANK can hug you too ICE?

Check war stats. They tell everything. Any tribe who has went to war with DRINK/DRANK has been defeated.

Why? Because we hug everyone?

yes... how easy is it to recruit most of the good competition from the world?
and im sorry little nooblet player. everyone knows that a family tribe is automatically considered hugging.
dam, even any alliance with the 2nd rank power is hugging. to share a name and leader is just sad.

there are tribe limits for a reason. its because the game is meant to played by fighting to gain ground.
not recruiting everyone that has decent points and wait for your own members to barb so you can noble them.

and this everyone, is why world 2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10 all have crappy and very low od stats with 1 sided war conquers.
high 5 scrubs. be glad you didn't join my world :)
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
Interesting.
Jake that implies that you did otherwise.
So does that mean the ones you recruited (poached?) were not the good competition?
 

DeletedUser3007

Guest
our member count at the time, was somewhere between 20-30 vs the world.
you want to try make me look bad you'll just do it to yourself :)
 
Top