Noble option discussion thread

[DeletedUser]

Which noble option do you prefer?

1. Coins
2. Packets
3. I have no preference

Discuss here!

 

[DeletedUser]

Coins. Defiantly Coins.

 

[DeletedUser]

coins.. BUt the sucky part about packets is academy limits of nobles

 

[DeletedUser3990]

Coins, no question.

 

[DeletedUser4176]

Coins

 

[DeletedUser]

Can world 10 please allow barb nobling? FTLOG!

why have bonus vills otherwise? -----> bonus vills are awesome for customizing vills. nice have a 16,000 plus axe vill,

or a 10000 scout vill, etc,., etc,


I though world 9 and the no barb nobling would have been Sweeeeeet since that whole bickering between tribe members would be non exist,

But actually it has been not so well played out. smaller highly skilled "loner" types tend to avoid the larger hordes for good cause. this game shouldn't be a popularity contest.

 

[DeletedUser]

Yes, W10 has barb nobling.

 

[DeletedUser]

coin

 

[DeletedUser3449]

always coins

 

[DeletedUser3836]

coins definately

 

[DeletedUser]

Coins or the us9 level with barb nobling ;O free villages

 

[DeletedUser3214]

1. Coins

 

[DeletedUser1446]

Packets! I like "Old School"!

 

[DeletedUser3007]

coinage

 

[DeletedUser]

coins

 

[DeletedUser2328]

Coins, all the way!

 

[DeletedUser]

i like both actually

 

[DeletedUser]

I like packets, I feel like coins are a bit pricey and annoying.

 

[DeletedUser]

will not play a coin world anymore

 

[DeletedUser]

Packets. 'Cause if you noble someone, then they stay nobled. I've always been annoyed at the way coins allow you to noble new villages once you lose an old village. Admittedly, this kind fails if the player you noble has saved up a lot of packets, but then the player is probably semi-inactive anyhow, so who cares.