Richie Rich

  • Thread starter DeletedUser3378
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

DeletedUser2247

Guest
[h=3]Account sitter premium permissions[/h]While sitting your account, sitters will be able to:
View your Premium log
Spend Premium Points on activating time based features such as the Premium account
Spend Premium Points on activating instant features such as build time reduction

make sure you turn off sitters option to screw you over
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I dont know why, but i`m cool with what he did. It somehow shows again what player rich is, and i think he learned something out of this experience. This is a game, but it takes more than inthernet and pc to play it. Tbh, i would let things how they are now,no measures taken by admins; everybody learned the lesson, maybe edge will have more enemies now, idk.
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
I agree with sedace.And having enemies is a part of the game.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Let's all chill with the insults shall we?

Kind regards,

Josh.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I think this whole situation is pretty funny. It is a scummy thing to do but all is fair in war right? It is not like it was a hack or anything, He got himself into that situation and then faced the consequences... Perhaps he has learned something from all this :)
 

DeletedUser5232

Guest
This is the worst incident i ever seen in Sitting account. well i think admin's will do the best for this two players problems.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
This is the worst incident i ever seen in Sitting account. well i think admin's will do the best for this two players problems.
I haven't logged in for 32H, I just logged in to check and I'm still not banned (and to my surprise I don't have / had any incomings from neighbors either - shows how skilled the players on this world are). Richie Rich still has less points than he had two days ago, so I don't think any action will be taken, at all. And to be honest, why should any action be taken? This was his own fault, and the rules clearly state this: "we will not be able to repair the damage done to the account, so please make sure you always choose a responsible account sitter."


 

DeletedUser5232

Guest
I haven't logged in for 32H, I just logged in to check and I'm still not banned (and to my surprise I don't have / had any incomings from neighbors either - shows how skilled the players on this world are). Richie Rich still has less points than he had two days ago, so I don't think any action will be taken, at all. And to be honest, why should any action be taken? This was his own fault, and the rules clearly state this: "we will not be able to repair the damage done to the account, so please make sure you always choose a responsible account sitter."



well you have a points mate, but please you need to feel conscience what you've done and i know there's a rule about sitting account "we will not be able to repair the damage done to the account, so please make sure you always choose a responsible account sitter." this time you'll win but for sure karma will arrived to you too :) just a friendly advice if you act the same in playing game, you act same in your real life :D

P.S
SOrry if my English grammar sucks so sorry about that.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I don't know if it's in violation of the rules, but you made a conscience decision to destroy an account. I don't know what moral compass you follow but using somebodies time and money to destroy an account they created is terrible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser707

Guest
I don't know if it's in violation of the rules, but you made a conscience decision to destroy an account. I don't know what morale compass you follow but using somebodies time and money to destroy an account they created is terrible.

This sums up my thoughts on the situation perfectly. I understand he will learn a lesson, and he should have turned off his settings. Chances are though hes a newer player and didn't know about the setting, he learned a lesson he should not have been taught and now he will pay for it and likely TW will pay for it also. The last thing the US server needs (a server with already very few players on it) is to be showing newer players/younger players that this is how older more experienced players play this game.

I hope he doesn't let the immature play of one player ruin his TW experience. I also hope that the player who did this will regret it and not do it again....


~ Pursuit of happiness
 

DeletedUser5247

Guest

Technically if you are psychopathic then you lack a morale compass so you wouldn't be able to follow your own.

You're correct in that sociopaths lack a sense of moral responsibility, but that doesn't mean that they don't understand that the things that they do are wrong.
Again 90% of sociopaths don't realize what they are doing is wrong because they don't have a sense of wrong. Typical actions are done simply because it causes distress to others and lowers their status. To a sociopath this doesn't seem wrong, bad, etc., because this is just what a sociopath does. The recognition that they are doing something wrong would mean they are conscious of harmful motives and thus not psychopathic. (Google definitions aren't always the most accurate).
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Technically if you are psychopathic then you lack a morale compass so you wouldn't be able to follow your own.


Again 90% of sociopaths don't realize what they are doing is wrong because they don't have a sense of wrong. Typical actions are done simply because it causes distress to others and lowers their status. To a sociopath this doesn't seem wrong, bad, etc., because this is just what a sociopath does. The recognition that they are doing something wrong would mean they are conscious of harmful motives and thus not psychopathic. (Google definitions aren't always the most accurate).
Psychopathy and Sociopathy are two different things. You're mixing them up. What you said in the 2nd alinea would be correct if you'd switch the word Sociopath with Psychopath. Sociopaths on the other hand to have a "moral compass". A Sociopath is not the same as a Psychopath, and you shouldn't use the terms interchangeably (happens often).

Also, don't say stuff like: x(%) of [insert definition] do/don't [insert symptom] - if you're talking about definitions, someone/something DOES or either DOESN'T meet the criteria of a definition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser5247

Guest
Psychopathy and Sociopathy are two different things. You're mixing them up. What you said in the 2nd alinea would be correct if you'd switch the word Sociopath with Psychopath. Sociopaths on the other hand to have a "moral compass". A Sociopath is not the same as a Psychopath, and you shouldn't use the terms interchangeably (happens often).

Also, don't say stuff like: x(%) of [insert definition] do/don't [insert symptom] - if you're talking about definitions, someone/something DOES or either DOESN'T meet the criteria of a definition.

This is very off topic and I apologize to the Mod but I would like to set the record straight. DSM 4 basically stated that psychopathy is moral insanity, essentially the inability to distinguish between what is right wrong and else wise. DSM 5 interchanges psychopathy as a person with Anti-Social Personality disorder. (This disorder doesn't mean you just don't like being around people like the word Anti-Social does). If you look at Sociopath's, it also is interchangeable with Anti-Social Personality disorder. They both do mean the same thing, they essentially are interchangeable, I was not mixing them up.

If you want to get into a psychological debate (I have a doctorate in Clinical Psychology) please personal mail me because this frankly doesn't belong in this thread.
 

Deleted User - 419875

Guest
This thread is now closed as it has gone way off topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top