SPERG: Fail Tribe, in a FAIL world :(

DeletedUser

Guest
I just said a number.2200 villages owned by SPERG out of about 30k.And this means about 14%.

You're bad at math. 2200 is less than 10 percent of 30000.

Additionally, you're bad at reading comprehension.
* domination - Percentage of player owned villages owned by a tribe.

I don't see an easy way to get at player owned villages as a metric. Eyeballing it, I'd say there are around 10000 player owned villages (5290 owned by tribes 2-20, so I'm almost certainly overstating it), which gives sperg ~23% domination.
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
Really?I'm bad at math?

30.000:2200=13,6363636
So...Am I wrong when I say about 14%?
After you said it's under 10 I checked it on the phone.I think it's right what I said.
 

DeletedUser548

Guest
Ok, I have no participation in this world, and I just read this worlds forums for fun, but Dase, you are a moron...

3000 is 10% of 30.000... 2200 is around 7-9% of 30.000...

How do you get 14% for 2200? It takes 3000(10) to make 30.000, thus 3000 would be 10 percent. Because 3000>2200, 2200 must be <10%
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
I did 10x2200=22000 and I tought this means is over 10% :))
My bad.
 

DeletedUser548

Guest
How'd you get 13.63 then? I managed to get that with 30.000/2200, but that wouldn't give the percentage.

Anyways, for those of you in W2 who don't know,

Number of players: 1.656
Total villages: 33.232 (20.07 per player)
Player villages: 9.926

1 SPERG 18,287,054 2,290

There are 9.926 player villages, and sperg has 2.290 of them.

SPERG owns just over 23% of player villages in the world, and under 7% of total villages (Which is 33.000+)
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
I was talking about 30000(total villages) and 2200 that SPERG owns.
30.000:2200=about 14
 

DeletedUser548

Guest
I was talking about 30000(total villages) and 2200 that SPERG owns.
30.000:2200=about 14



I was talking about that...

To get the percentage of that, you would divide 30.000 by 100 (to get 1%) then you take that 1%, and divide 2200 by it. And you have your percentage.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
here.png


Look, this is what the server says! 6.9% now
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Please put us in endgame. And if it's because you don't want w2 to end before w1... that's to bad.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Please put us in endgame. And if it's because you don't want w2 to end before w1... that's to bad.

Just thought i would pick up on this firstly. For one the Mod's arnt bothered about W2 finishing before W1, what difference could that make?

Second you might think your in the end game phase but im pretty sure you have a small while to go.

Try reading this: http://forum.tribalwars.net/showpost.php?p=6037464&postcount=1


To be perfectly honest not sure if those still apply over here but so far as i know they do. So read that and then you might understand?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Just thought i would pick up on this firstly. For one the Mod's arnt bothered about W2 finishing before W1, what difference could that make?

Second you might think your in the end game phase but im pretty sure you have a small while to go.

Try reading this: http://forum.tribalwars.net/showpost.php?p=6037464&postcount=1


To be perfectly honest not sure if those still apply over here but so far as i know they do. So read that and then you might understand?

Reduction of packets / gold coins to 1/2 of the original price

This setting will be implemented after the player count on a world falls below 1000 players and stays below for at least a week.

US2 has been under 1000 players for close to two weeks, I think. If you're looking at actually active players, beyond the stragglers that just log on once a week to check on their 76 point villages, it's pretty close to 500.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Just thought i would pick up on this firstly. For one the Mod's arnt bothered about W2 finishing before W1, what difference could that make?

Second you might think your in the end game phase but im pretty sure you have a small while to go.

Try reading this: http://forum.tribalwars.net/showpost.php?p=6037464&postcount=1


To be perfectly honest not sure if those still apply over here but so far as i know they do. So read that and then you might understand?

If you read that, then you might understand that we qualify for half price nobles, and have for some time.

Unlike the other US servers.

But hey, it's fun to be smug and mouth off without thinking, isn't it?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
In that post did i ever mention that you didnt qualify for half price nobles?

No not once so before you go on about me being smug, i wasnt. In an essence i helped you.

The only thing i said was that you hadnt fully entered to end game phase. So who's mouthing off?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
In that post did i ever mention that you didnt qualify for half price nobles?

No not once so before you go on about me being smug, i wasnt. In an essence i helped you.

The only thing i said was that you hadnt fully entered to end game phase. So who's mouthing off?

Your post said we didn't qualify for the end game phase. Half price nobles is the start of the end game phase.

Oh, and by the way? You didn't help us. Which you would know if you had read all of the threads around here about this. Here's my prior post:
More to the point, the .net guideline for cheap nobles is when a server has less than 1000 totals players. We're at 990, according to twstats.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Yes i said you dont qualify for the end phase, which is the whole of the end phase, and so that is the start, i never once said anything about stages just abou th whole thing in general.

Oh well suppose i didnt, i can admit that which i dont mind. But with the guideline there its easier for everyone to read so you know. :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Nope, no skill is needed when a single tribe of huggers is too doominant, especially 3 months into a new world. Sure, people can have individual skills. No, you dont need them, and do not use them.

I had forgotten how cool some of this guy's posts were. Here's some sick hugging in action off the ODA list

Rank Name Defeated
1 ZomgItsSara [SPERG] 15,64 Mio.
2 destroyman1 [SPERG] 14,91 Mio.
3 VonWagner [SPERG] 13,44 Mio.
4 Kill2Ub1 [SPERG] 12,31 Mio.
5 Lyrec [SPERG] 9,13 Mio.
6 seecretlare [SPERG] 6,75 Mio.
7 kenshinsanosuke [SPERG] 6,25 Mio.
8 poly [+JP+] 5,38 Mio.
9 jag04titan [SPERG] 5,04 Mio.
10 Abnrml1 [UNITED] 4,94 Mio.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Personally, I don't think we qualify for cheaper nobles.

Regardless if we have 500 players left.

Why?

Because this world is so small. We can't compare this world to a .net world.
The biggest player here is Sara with what, 4.2 mio points? No offence Sara, but that's nothing.

When a .net server gets cheaper nobles they have top players with eh, atleast 10-20 mio points.

So I don't think we should get cheaper nobles, like ever. But that's just me.
 
Top