DeletedUser
Guest
| Number of players: | 8.782 |
|---|---|
| Total villages: | 11.257 (1.28 per player) |
| Player villages: | 8.703 |
| Barbarian villages: | 2.518 |
| Bonus villages: | 450 |
The stats for the other worlds might be wrong too.
The stats for the other worlds might be wrong too.
DeletedUser
Guest
No, it is calculated on total villages. That is intentional. This is not a bug.
DeletedUser
Guest
To make it clearer (because I know it'll annoy jesse 
), he's saying that it adds barbarian, bonus, and player village numbers, then divides it by the number of players (which is 1.28). That explains the "glitch" .
), he's saying that it adds barbarian, bonus, and player village numbers, then divides it by the number of players (which is 1.28). That explains the "glitch" .DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
Ahem: I read that, and clarified it further .
.DeletedUser
Guest
^ Lol.
I just don't understand it, because its wrong. Everybody has 1 village, but it says there is an average of 1.28 villages per player.
I just don't understand it, because its wrong. Everybody has 1 village, but it says there is an average of 1.28 villages per player.
DeletedUser
Guest
I will try to explain it further. There are, according to the above image, 11,257 total villages. There are a total of 8,703 players. When you divide the two numbers you get 1.28 villages per player. It does not tell you how many player villages per player there are. It tells you how many total villages per player there are. Total villages encompasses player village, barbarian villages, and bonus villages.
Hopefully this completely clarifies what that number signifies. If you have more questions, post below.
Hopefully this completely clarifies what that number signifies. If you have more questions, post below.
DeletedUser
Guest
Thanks, I understand what the number means now. I was thinking it was the average number of villages per player.