DeletedUser
Guest
Erm...... I Won't Even Comment On That 
DeletedUser
Guest
Except some people can troll in a more intelligent way rather than using derogatory statements.
DeletedUser
Guest
because your were powned after the protection
No actually I went top 10 startup, then quit.
DeletedUser623
Guest
am i a loser?
DeletedUser
Guest
Yup
He He, I Joke, We All Wuv Ya (Except For The Others)
He He, I Joke, We All Wuv Ya (Except For The Others)
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
Some, but not the ones who trolled our thread. And the following was just the first derogatory statement:
Kthxbai.
DeletedUser452
Guest
I only trolled in that thread because it was an awful idea to lead more than one tribe at once. This tribe is like relatively 2000X better.
DeletedUser
Guest
Lol, you can't be serious now can you?
Explain why it is 2000x better?
The almighty, you are a joke.
DeletedUser
Guest
Exactly, pwned after start up.
DeletedUser452
Guest
Because he is only trying to lead one tribe at a time.
DeletedUser
Guest
Let me reference to you what was said:
.Snackerjack said:because your were powned after the protection
See the difference in what we're arguing? Just wanted to make that clear before I continue to laugh at your assumption:
He got pwned after start-up. - False, he quit. You have no reason to assume he got pwned. You are assuming that because he quit, he got pwned. But he was top 10 at the time he quit, judging by what he said. The mere likelihood that he got pwned, considering that I'm well aware of his skill in both start-up and wars, and his activity levels, is very laughable. All in all, you're just trolling as usual.
So you're telling me that a good leader can't lead two tribes at once, but that a bad leader leading 1 tribe will perform better (if this player is bad)? You, again, are just trolling and clearly have no idea what you're claiming. Some of the best leaders, such as Rednecks on W12 (who was leading DNY when he won W12 in first place, no less), also led in other worlds whilst leading DNY. Does that make him a fail? Definitely not. Nor does it mean DNY or the other tribe was any worse. So please, take your trolling elsewhere.
DeletedUser
Guest
More then two? Can anyone lead a tribe on 4 worlds, at the same time? I don't think so.
Also this player has provided information about himself. If you want to validate his skills you could enter the TWstats for .nl or ask the people on the .nl forums.
DeletedUser
Guest
Hi there
Can i join this tribe? What do you say
Can i join this tribe? What do you say
DeletedUser
Guest
Considering that the second world hasn't come out yet, and it's been 6 months, and hardly enough people play the .us server for them to have it be worth it to open 4 worlds, I'd say it's pretty plausible that he could lead 2 or 3 with the same group of people in it, which it will be. Let me exaggerate too, if you can:
Can anyone lead 700 worlds with 20 players all different in each world even though it's not likely it'll happen? Of course not
.So because he provides names, the twstats for .nl has to be both found by us and checked, and we have to cross-check on the forums or with people on those forums to verify that it's really him? And if we did all that, not only are too many people too lazy to do that, but it's much too useless when the player might be lying for us to feel we wasted all that time. SmashNasty has people vouching for him here, is obviously known by players here, and will give you any information if you ask him personally. Apparently, it's only good if you want to spend (and let me exaggerate like you did above) 20 hours of work to find out if a leader is good or not in terms of points and in-game skill, not leadership, because people vouching for the other guy and his willingness to give information personally isn't good enough.
Is anyone else seeing the irony?
As for the leader guy, this is all hypothetical. I'm not calling you a bad player/leader, and I wish you the best of luck
. Hope to see you in the world .DeletedUser
Guest
Considering that the second world hasn't come out yet, and it's been 6 months, and hardly enough people play the .us server for them to have it be worth it to open 4 worlds, I'd say it's pretty plausible that he could lead 2 or 3 with the same group of people in it, which it will be. Let me exaggerate too, if you can:
Can anyone lead 700 worlds with 20 players all different in each world even though it's not likely it'll happen? Of course not
So because he provides names, the twstats for .nl has to be both found by us and checked, and we have to cross-check on the forums or with people on those forums to verify that it's really him? And if we did all that, not only are too many people too lazy to do that, but it's much too useless when the player might be lying for us to feel we wasted all that time. SmashNasty has people vouching for him here, is obviously known by players here, and will give you any information if you ask him personally. Apparently, it's only good if you want to spend (and let me exaggerate like you did above) 20 hours of work to find out if a leader is good or not in terms of points and in-game skill, not leadership, because people vouching for the other guy and his willingness to give information personally isn't good enough.
Is anyone else seeing the irony?
As for the leader guy, this is all hypothetical. I'm not calling you a bad player/leader, and I wish you the best of luck
I know smash, or reconise his name, he did pretty good on a world on .net, I would have him in a tribe with me, not sure on his leadership skills though.
DeletedUser
Guest
Considering that the second world hasn't come out yet, and it's been 6 months, and hardly enough people play the .us server for them to have it be worth it to open 4 worlds, I'd say it's pretty plausible that he could lead 2 or 3 with the same group of people in it, which it will be. Let me exaggerate too, if you can:
Can anyone lead 700 worlds with 20 players all different in each world even though it's not likely it'll happen? Of course not
So because he provides names, the twstats for .nl has to be both found by us and checked, and we have to cross-check on the forums or with people on those forums to verify that it's really him? And if we did all that, not only are too many people too lazy to do that, but it's much too useless when the player might be lying for us to feel we wasted all that time. SmashNasty has people vouching for him here, is obviously known by players here, and will give you any information if you ask him personally. Apparently, it's only good if you want to spend (and let me exaggerate like you did above) 20 hours of work to find out if a leader is good or not in terms of points and in-game skill, not leadership, because people vouching for the other guy and his willingness to give information personally isn't good enough.
Is anyone else seeing the irony?
As for the leader guy, this is all hypothetical. I'm not calling you a bad player/leader, and I wish you the best of luck
A good leader could lead two tribes with the same players on two worlds however you could not lead 3 tribes on 3 different worlds with a different group of players. That would just require too much time.
SmashNasty has players vouching for him because the high amount of .net players that have decided to go to .us. This is the first .nl player i've seen post in this forum, so it's pretty logical to assume that he will have less players to support his playing skills.
Oh and i've never heard of these players that vouch for smash
DeletedUser623
Guest
Then your retarded and a noob (their using aliases (duh!) ) moving on...
DeletedUser
Guest
A good leader could lead two tribes with the same players on two worlds however you could not lead 3 tribes on 3 different worlds with a different group of players. That would just require too much time.
SmashNasty has players vouching for him because the high amount of .net players that have decided to go to .us. This is the first .nl player i've seen post in this forum, so it's pretty logical to assume that he will have less players to support his playing skills.
Oh and i've never heard of these players that vouch for smash
They vouch for me just because they seem it fit.
After a few months, you can take it upon yourself to make a proper examination of my abilities.
And .Nick... <3 You're awesome.
DeletedUser
Guest
A good leader could lead two tribes with the same players on two worlds however you could not lead 3 tribes on 3 different worlds with a different group of players. That would just require too much time.
SmashNasty has players vouching for him because the high amount of .net players that have decided to go to .us. This is the first .nl player i've seen post in this forum, so it's pretty logical to assume that he will have less players to support his playing skills.
Oh and i've never heard of these players that vouch for smash
I'm not famous I generally co-play under someone elses account, infact this account name has only played on one world. I have co-played Nudist on multipul (sp?) worlds. I have co-played with several other fairly good players but Nudist is by far the best and most well known.