DeletedUser
Guest
noobery, you're such a noob :O coming from yo ex-leadah
DeletedUser
Guest
1)democracy mostly.
2)activity( I figure that out by mailing in different times and asking about their experience although i dont really care) and total hauled(which pretty much says everything)
3)their total hauled.
4)A way of getting members safer,which in this case we all seem kind of safe.
5)Depends.If its just one player attacking the other player,I dont do anything.small startup skirmishes are unavoidable and very often.everyone tries to clear the threats in his 15x15.If he cant take care of himself,why would I bother to do that for him?(that's why i put recruitment requirements so high).
but if more than 1 player was involved,then its either an all out war, or diplomacy if losses would be great.
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
Im not a leader in w4, but i usually ed up being forced to an leadership position in every world i play, thus the thoughs of the future leader of an w4 tribe 
1) I lead by Dictatorship, Democracy, or Socialism? Explain your position.
I lead in an authoritarian (no noobery, did you mean that by socialism? because socialism is not an 'way to lead' :/) way...i share almost everything with a few people (usually my council) but lead with an iron fist when it comes to people i do not 100% trust...
2) The ONE thing I look for in a potential recruit is...... (Explain)
Position - good people in bad positions are useless/bad people in good positions can always be sat/stacked
3) I ensure my members have troops by......
Threatening them with getting kicked/internaled.
4) I think diplomacy is.......
useful for set periods of time to work against a common enemy.
For marking purposes only.
5) My response to players attacking my players is War, Hugging, or Diplomacy? Explain
Actuallyall of the abolve.
If i want to war the other tribe, i can use it as an excuse.
If i want to hug that tribe (make in my Female dog), i can give the other tribe an ultimatum.
And if i think i need that tribe as an nap/ally, i can work from there.
1) I lead by Dictatorship, Democracy, or Socialism? Explain your position.
I lead in an authoritarian (no noobery, did you mean that by socialism? because socialism is not an 'way to lead' :/) way...i share almost everything with a few people (usually my council) but lead with an iron fist when it comes to people i do not 100% trust...
2) The ONE thing I look for in a potential recruit is...... (Explain)
Position - good people in bad positions are useless/bad people in good positions can always be sat/stacked
3) I ensure my members have troops by......
Threatening them with getting kicked/internaled.
4) I think diplomacy is.......
For marking purposes only.
5) My response to players attacking my players is War, Hugging, or Diplomacy? Explain
Actuallyall of the abolve.
If i want to war the other tribe, i can use it as an excuse.
If i want to hug that tribe (make in my Female dog), i can give the other tribe an ultimatum.
And if i think i need that tribe as an nap/ally, i can work from there.
DeletedUser
Guest
I am aprillovescats of the tribe iPod (newly named, actually the player in World 3 who's tribe is named that suggested that in our tribe).
1) I lead by Dictatorship, Democracy, or Socialism? Explain your position.
I lead by dictatorship, because I feel that the players inside the tribe with less experience won't know what is best for the tribe if I give a poll or multiple answers. Leaders always know what is best and will guide the tribe in the right direction. HOWEVER, I give the tribe a chance to put in input by speaking in mail, giving minor polls, and talking to them by seeing what they like.
2) The ONE thing I look for in a potential recruit is...... (Explain)
I look for someone who is loyal and will stay with the tribe for eternity. For instance, some leaders look for experienced players. Why? This early in the game, you can easily teach the players what is right and wrong. And if that experienced player leaves, then it was all just a waste. If I have to tweak a player's habits, it'll be just as well, if they will keep on fighting for the tribe.
3) I ensure my members have troops by......
I have to assume my player's have troops by seeing how fast they can build (by farming) and if they attack/are attacked and I see their troops, and they have none/little, then that is the time to make adjustments (anything from telling him to make troops to kicking).
4) I think diplomacy is.......
I think diplomacy is the neutral discussion of trying to find what is best for a tribe. For instance, using diplomacy to get an ally, the point is trying to do what is best for the tribe, without screaming, threats, or war-like statements. Otherwise, using threats would be blackmail, and anything aggressive isn't doing what is best by losing yourself.
5) My response to players attacking my players is War, Hugging, or Diplomacy? Explain.
If there is a certain tribe who keeps attacking violently, won't cease when I do diplomacy, then I will declare war. I won't let anything slide.
Usually, first, I will speak to a tribe, and see why they are attacking. From there, I choose one.
Diplomacy is used when they were just trying to do the best for themselves but agreed to stop, then I might mention having a NAP or having the players working together in their area.
I rarely use hugging, but if desperately needed, I'll use it to save the player being attacked.
In other words, at different circumstances, I use all three options to my players being attacked.
1) I lead by Dictatorship, Democracy, or Socialism? Explain your position.
I lead by dictatorship, because I feel that the players inside the tribe with less experience won't know what is best for the tribe if I give a poll or multiple answers. Leaders always know what is best and will guide the tribe in the right direction. HOWEVER, I give the tribe a chance to put in input by speaking in mail, giving minor polls, and talking to them by seeing what they like.
2) The ONE thing I look for in a potential recruit is...... (Explain)
I look for someone who is loyal and will stay with the tribe for eternity. For instance, some leaders look for experienced players. Why? This early in the game, you can easily teach the players what is right and wrong. And if that experienced player leaves, then it was all just a waste. If I have to tweak a player's habits, it'll be just as well, if they will keep on fighting for the tribe.
3) I ensure my members have troops by......
I have to assume my player's have troops by seeing how fast they can build (by farming) and if they attack/are attacked and I see their troops, and they have none/little, then that is the time to make adjustments (anything from telling him to make troops to kicking).
4) I think diplomacy is.......
I think diplomacy is the neutral discussion of trying to find what is best for a tribe. For instance, using diplomacy to get an ally, the point is trying to do what is best for the tribe, without screaming, threats, or war-like statements. Otherwise, using threats would be blackmail, and anything aggressive isn't doing what is best by losing yourself.
5) My response to players attacking my players is War, Hugging, or Diplomacy? Explain.
If there is a certain tribe who keeps attacking violently, won't cease when I do diplomacy, then I will declare war. I won't let anything slide.
Usually, first, I will speak to a tribe, and see why they are attacking. From there, I choose one.
Diplomacy is used when they were just trying to do the best for themselves but agreed to stop, then I might mention having a NAP or having the players working together in their area.
I rarely use hugging, but if desperately needed, I'll use it to save the player being attacked.
In other words, at different circumstances, I use all three options to my players being attacked.
DeletedUser
Guest
Player-SchizoIIsmexy
Tribe-Nood
1) Diplomacy- I am basically the president and the tribe acts pretty much like the U.S. gov(besides the pointless debates about the debt ceiling that never comes to an end lol)
2) Troops- You said only one thing so that would have to be it. i act sit all of my recruits(not like have alot of em lol) but i also look at awards, farming(based off of reports), od, and points(for growth purposes)
3) Act sits
4) Very much so one of the strongest weapons a person can have. But this early is kinda unnecessary, later though very important.
5) War- There is no other answer for this(except if diplomacy is already in order)
Tribe-Nood
1) Diplomacy- I am basically the president and the tribe acts pretty much like the U.S. gov(besides the pointless debates about the debt ceiling that never comes to an end lol)
2) Troops- You said only one thing so that would have to be it. i act sit all of my recruits(not like have alot of em lol) but i also look at awards, farming(based off of reports), od, and points(for growth purposes)
3) Act sits
4) Very much so one of the strongest weapons a person can have. But this early is kinda unnecessary, later though very important.
5) War- There is no other answer for this(except if diplomacy is already in order)
DeletedUser
Guest
1-Democracy i guess.....dictatorship..... ehhh, not really dictatorship no, so democracy, well, its how i feel on days.
2-Troops, you can have 100 points but if you had 800 troops then id let you in. and you have to farm alot and be active. and chill, laid back.
3-I account sit them all and warn them they will be kicked and farmed if they don't have enough troops. :]
4-Diplomacy is Important but sometimes tribes go to crazy with it like jackal or sparta(or now they call themselves L-LEG and F-LEG) You cant have to much or you'll have no room to grow and fall. To little then you could be taken over.
5-WAR! even an invite could mean war. Like BbZn, they invited a member so we crushed them. (we have peace now) Im not a sissy leader with a sissy tribe, you attack one and we will respond.