Thesis of the Day

DeletedUser

Guest
This is the Thesis of the day topic, here you can discuss a thesis.

:rules:

and the first thesis (Forum time) is the thesis of the day.

The first thesis :D

Mass-tribes (25+) are noob, I think that elite tribes are much better organised, and I'm used to it
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What about an elite tribe with more than 25 members? Are you saying that they are not as coordinated or skilled or whatever it is you're saying, as a tribe with less than 25 members?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What about an elite tribe with more than 25 members? Are you saying that they are not as coordinated or skilled or whatever it is you're saying, as a tribe with less than 25 members?

I'd say that 30 members is max, and don't get me wrong, cause I don't think that Masses always have to be bas tribes. But at .NL we are used to small elite tribes, and most of the time the ones who have under 25 members are the numbers 1->20
 

DeletedUser

Guest
That doesn't necessarily mean that 25+ member tribes are "noob", as you so nicely stated. Just because tribes with lots of members in general are mass recruitment tribes about 95% of the time, doesn't mean that everyone is. Just saying, it wasn't a very good generalization there :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I've ran tribes of 60 players and tribes of 10, just as organized and coordinated as the other.

Maybe you just haven't been in that good of a tribe.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I've ran tribes of 60 players and tribes of 10, just as organized and coordinated as the other.

Note the wording in this message - there is no mention about the level of organisation or co-ordination. Just that they are both as goodbad as each other :eek:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I've ran tribes of 60 players and tribes of 10, just as organized and coordinated as the other.

Maybe you just haven't been in that good of a tribe.

Then I think that we aren't very good planners in Holland :$

But generaly you'll see that the tribes with less members have a higher growing rate than the ones who have many members
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Americans like to do everything big, don't they?
I don't start big
 

DeletedUser

Guest
If you know what I mean @9gag :p

We already have 3 tribe members from holland, and the're are more dutch tribes :D
 

Dase

<img src="//media.innogamescdn.com/com_DS_US/TEAM-
Reaction score
239
What's the point of this thread ibilsi?I really think u are wrong.Look at IDC.They have more than 25 members and are really good.dragonfly is a top 20 player anyway.He was top 20 on w5 too.They're players were first to 1k plundered and 1 mill looted.So they are good.Still,all the other tribes suck.I don't really see any other elite tribe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
:p
The use of this thread was just to discuss ingame things, and because I saw that there are a lot of Mass tribes (I keep calling them that way) I came up with this thesis
 

DeletedUser

Guest
:p
The use of this thread was just to discuss ingame things, and because I saw that there are a lot of Mass tribes (I keep calling them that way) I came up with this thesis

NL faald i mean fail.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What's the point of this thread ibilsi?I really think u are wrong.Look at IDC.They have more than 25 members and are really good.dragonfly is a top 20 player anyway.He was top 20 on w5 too.They're players were first to 1k plundered and 1 mill looted.So they are good.Still,all the other tribes suck.I don't really see any other elite tribe.


Just because you are a good player, doesn't mean your tribe is a good tribe.
And you can be a noob, but still have a lot of points. You're a good player if you know how to play the game. And that's not being in a mass tribe. (Like IDC)
 
Top