War Against Drunk Tribal Warring

DeletedUser5591

Guest
Just because selfie and U? continue to munch villages on the rim and gain points faster than the core players they still continue to do minimal on the font line,

No matter how big the are on the back lines they are still losing tribe vs tribe

A tribe that has lost 15 more villages than taken against the tribe its warring is not winning a war,.


We can all go hit the rim growing 200% faster hitting small players only just joining the game,.BUT you cant call THAT war STATS lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser5591

Guest
After we wipe them out of the core and push them into the rim, and they are still grow faster than drunk/drink Losing ground to the tribe your warring and taking rim villages is not winning :)
 

Sweeney

Royal Guardian W17
Reaction score
42
A 15 conquer lead? Wow! When you look at the size of the tribes, that's a truly massive 0.55% loss!

Was that sarcasm? Yes, it was. A month goes by and you have a 15 village lead in war caps. That's hardly worth mentioning, here's why. Selfie and U? are taking roughly 940 villages per month, most of which are these so called "rim villages". Imagine if they gave their entire devotion to the frontline and only took 10 villages on the rim per month. It'd then take D/D only 46 years to win (yes there's that sarcasm again) - and that's assuming D/D can keep up that 15 conquer lead when their opposition focuses their entire force on them.

Unless either side makes any significant conquer gain (50+) in a month, this war will be moot. However we can look to the growth of each side as a 'winning' factor, which I have previously outlined.
 

DeletedUser5591

Guest
I know its nothing to be outlined in such a small lead but the fact remains we are leading , and to suggest the other side is winning when they have lost more villages than gain vs us IS a Deluded way of seeing things ;)

Plus these rim villages are not a real threat to the core as the noble limit, Soon im sure other tribes will start to fight back .

Ps. we did take out 30 villages in one day , once again not great But i guess (Unless either side makes any significant conquer gain (50+) in a month) lol what a joke
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sweeney

Royal Guardian W17
Reaction score
42
to suggest the other side is winning when they have lost more villages than gain vs us IS a Deluded way of seeing things
I am not sure where you're getting this severely flawed logic from. I would suggest you leader straps your muzzle on before you embarrass the tribe even further.

You are essentially claiming that conquer difference means everything in war. This is certainly not the case. By your logic D/D could take 1 more village off U? whilst Selfie makes Alex . delete - and D/D would be winning the war because they have the greater amount of conquers. I am not saying that has happened or going to happen, just highlighting the error of your naive vertical thinking.


Plus these rim villages are not a real threat to the core as the noble limit
Another ridiculous comment. Just because they cannot noble from here doesn't stop them from nuking you, or using them for support.


(Unless either side makes any significant conquer gain (50+) in a month) lol what a joke
Why is that a joke? A joke is thinking 15 conquers a month is going to get you anywhere. Unless you plan on playing this world for 4 decades.
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser3141

Guest
LOL c'mon guys.
Sween you need to pay another visit to the blarney stone (besides I rather enjoy a little Irish charm).
All this proves is what most of us already know, statistics mean very little. What matters is what players feel is happening. The winner in the end will be down to morale and activity levels.
As regards location, well it depends on how you look at it. A dense core does as always help with defence. Otoh both U? and Selfie have a deeper backline.
The only real difference between a family tribe and allied tribes is in state of mind. In this I think the support rules actually help because members switch form one to the other constantly which breaks down barriers. If allies had the same level of trust then there would be no difference. I do not however believe that Selfie and U? could manage that.
Let's not forget also that there are other tribes involved in this. There are a variety of allies/academies/basher tribes who are taking a larger or smaller role.
 

DeletedUser5591

Guest
My point is only if you noble other players rather than the enemy how can you claim to be winning the war, yes they are bigger but winning no,

Ive said from the start with no support outside of the tribe its gonna be a slow war but hey.
 

DeletedUser5592

Guest
So both tribes had relations with ME, who were being lead by old DD members, and they chose us. Sounds like a soar loser :/


And shamless, I know exactly what your talking about. Just check out what the blind ants on your side are doing! The latest train to come to my village.

Attacker:soonerlawcb
Origin:***Noble*** (552|431) K45
Quantity:001000000001
Losses:001000000001
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
Errrrr .... so you sniped a train? So ......?
As for ME, the only issue there is that they approached us ..... then decided to switch sides without the courtesy of advising us. From another perspective .... the deal appears to have involved giving leaders U? accounts and coplay spots for others with those not in favour being ditched and eaten. It's an approach that could come back to bite them later....... and to be sure involves a certain irony.
 

DeletedUser5592

Guest
I can see how that is upsetting. The courtesy part. And no that wasn't a sniped train, all four nobles were escorted with that. And the timed axe attacks in front of it consisted of just that, an axe.
 

Sweeney

Royal Guardian W17
Reaction score
42
All this proves is what most of us already know, statistics mean very little. What matters is what players feel is happening. The winner in the end will be down to morale and activity levels.
The growth of each tribe is a fairly accurate representation of activity.

The only real difference between a family tribe and allied tribes is in state of mind.
I strongly disagree. An ally is a tribe you work it for mutual advantage. A family tribe is essentially the same as your own tribe, it's simply a work-around the member limit.
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
Irritating for sure.
Hmmmm single timed fake in front of nobles with only an escort. I would send an escort with noble fakes as well .... you never know when one will actually succeed.
 

DeletedUser5611

Guest
Oh telling us that they planned to declare on U? .... after taking out 2Hard.
If we had left 2Hard to it of course the outcome would have been the same war we have now but we would have been much weaker.
Of course I guess I could be wrong and selfie were playing both sides but I doubt it. After all before TRA became part of 2Hard they had already been approached in an effort to get them to turn on us.
Mind you I can't really say in all honesty that I am unhappy at the outcome so far. Everything has pros and cons .... after all we can now attack in all directions. :D


don't know where you get your info from.. but u? got informed by my plan under the RawR war.. and well, It's still in motion :)
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
Then obviously you were telling different people different things and that approach was continued by other selfie leaders.
Big surprise.
 

DeletedUser5611

Guest
Then obviously you were telling different people different things and that approach was continued by other selfie leaders.
Big surprise.


At that point, It was only me and peachy in charge.. and we both made the plan. so whatever you heard, it was never told by someone with privs. and It's still just a handful of players that know's it..
 

DeletedUser3141

Guest
LOL at that point there were only 3 possibilities
1. Join with U? and attack D/D
2. Join with D/D and attack U?
3. Sit on the sidelines and watch while D/D and U? duked it out.

Since things have moved on from there considerably it hardly matters what you intended. However given you say you told U? this plan then option 2 was never on the cards despite what I was told later. Again it becomes merely something to make note of for the future.
 

DeletedUser5611

Guest
We spoke about going over our diplo after the RawR war.. but DD kept stepping on our toes.. and I wanted to deal with our diplo issues before downgrading it to a nap.

but the war was inevitable. So no need to be mean to each other :) .. lets just make w15 a world to remember, not for all the trash talk, betrayal and all the other negative sides of the game. May the tribe with the best tactics and players win the world, fair and square.. :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
We spoke about going over our diplo after the RawR war.. but DD kept stepping on our toes.. and I wanted to deal with our diplo issues before downgrading it to a nap.

but the war was inevitable. So no need to be mean to each other :) .. lets just make w15 a world to remember, not for all the trash talk, betrayal and all the other negative sides of the game. May the tribe with the best tactics and players win the world, fair and square.. :)

so you mean to say, you dont intend to win the world?
 

DeletedUser5705

Guest
We spoke about going over our diplo after the RawR war.. but DD kept stepping on our toes.. and I wanted to deal with our diplo issues before downgrading it to a nap.

but the war was inevitable. So no need to be mean to each other :) .. lets just make w15 a world to remember, not for all the trash talk, betrayal and all the other negative sides of the game. May the tribe with the best tactics and players win the world, fair and square.. :)

tbh dude i think the most fun worlds are the ones with all the betrayal and backstabbing :) but thats just my opinion . I dont mind dirty play ;)
 
Top