DeletedUser
Guest
im playing with myself though,so i win
You had Kenny to get you there :<
im playing with myself though,so i win
oh is that what you think?you may like to rethink.I had:You had Noise account players and ali...that is clearly not the best of w2...
Now about the topic...I have to say that Smash already won the world b4 it started...good for them
First of all, Smash must be one of the most successful tribes I have ever witnessed. Cleverly diplomacy and skillfully members made this tribe so feared that no other tribe even dared to take one lousy city from them.
It's sad though, that not even top 5 would join forces and rip Smash apart bit by bit, but rather rolled over and laid down waiting for their turn to be annihilated, and continued to fight each other instead of joining forces...
Looking at my own area after a week or so, there is no competition at all. In fact I have already grown beyond farming my neighbors and must cool down or I have nothing to feed on. Using money to cut down building time is therefore not an option at all, and I haven't even tested it yet.
A strange situation in a very strange world indeed...and I can imagine Smash just having a ball when they gather several skillfull players, and shouldn't be blamed for the others not attacking them.
Jesus, that is part of the game and strategy to not let that happen, and the art of war to take the competition out one by one. Hats off for Smash for a well done work, and we are so looking forward for W4 to start
To the haters -
We are trolls who are damn good at tribal wars, hence why we're slaughtering world 3. We are aggressive, egotistical, and loud-mouthed.
Googly said:If the world had a decent number of people in it, Smash wouldn't be so likely to be doing so well. If this were .net, Smash wouldn't be in the position they are in now. I am not trying to put Smash down here, but to put your comment in to perspective. They may be the most successful tribe you've ever witnessed, but do remember that the size of this world (the 4x4 grid isn't even doing well in terms of filling up) means that this means a lot less. All the talented members, on the whole, were in Fun or Smash. The majority being in Smash (or meant to be ).
And Googly, the only thing I would take issue with that you said that can be proven wrong, in my opinion, is this:
While we appreciate the...um...commentary, all you did was agree with him saying Smash was successful from what he'd seen, and that we had the talented members.
[...]how well one does with the obstacles they face[...]
[J]Which obstacles? It is not because one outsider considers smash to be successful, that they really are. You cannot really say one person counts for the .us community, or even on a broader scale, the vast tribalwars vicinity. And although your definition was correct, it was inappropriately used.If you scratch all those that are more successful than the subject of the list, then the subject is successful, am I right? Well, in comparison with other tribes that any more or less decent player with a couple of years playing experience stumbled upon, smash is not successful. The environment can always be bent and manipulated to give yourself a biased impression of what is happening. And as long as that biased impression is more suitable for your happiness (in this case smash' moral), one is always blind to see the whole picture. So belief whatever you want as long as it floats your boat, but we know better. I.e. we know smash is not as impressive and successful as they think they are [/J]
OP said:First of all, Smash must be one of the most successful tribes I have ever witnessed.
However, smash does not meet the expectations to be stamped as a good & skilled tribe.
This is an incredibly small world, and even with great settings barely any talented players from other servers came in. The ones who claim to be good have yet to show any form of talent that I have seen in this world via the externals so far (*cough* markeloff). Therefore, low competition is to be expected.