Conquering = taking control of a town
Rimming = Conquering all of, or the last of, a single player's towns
I did conquer Jeff.civ.
VW, your first two points could be correct, in context.
Your 3rd point, is flat wrong, and now you equivocate by attempting to surround it with other context, so you can attempt to deflect your single statement that was a catalyst.
Of course, what you have attempted to do is use one definition of a word in one context.
Rimming occurs when a player's last village is taken, and then the player REMAINS IN THE GAME and RESPAWNS on the "rim." Many never return, or just delete their account. In the original incarnations of TW, the respawn would place a player on the outer expanding "rim" of the world; however, now many worlds give the player the option to respawn in the tribal area, and not wind up on the "rim" after all. While "rimming" can be loosely used to mean just taking a last village in slang, if you attempt to define it to "prove" you are knowledgeable about TW terms, you need to do it more correctly.
No, you certainly did not.
Here, you attempted to use logical sequence of one context, to switch context, and try to support your original error.
LOL.
You're not arrogant.
You're a sensitive, prideful nOOb.
You've got some beginner-level game knowledge, and for some reason (presumably the "ranking"?) your are pretending to be more than the current player that your "are."
I suspect you want people to look to you, in a world that is mostly devoid of the normal proportions of skilled players, as an "expert"?
The lack of skilled players, however, does not increase your ability in the game.
Your ability remains the same, unless you learn.
You conquered a recently conquered
VILLAGE of jeff.civ.
You did not conquer jeff.civ.
Since you are sensitive and prideful, then let's put it this way.
"I conquered a village"
"I conquered a player"
Both can be correct.
The former means you gained possession of a village.
The latter means you took the last village of a player.
There is no village named "jeff.civ".
There is a player named "jeff.civ".
You did not conquer jeff.civ.
Do you understand now?
Of course you do, you did all the time.
But you were attempting to claim credit for something that you had in fact not done.
You were attempting to tell a player with a small point village that you destroyed one of the better players in us02, when you yourself were frantic with worry about losing troops.
Anything to stop getting owned, because you had not skillfully executed a long distance attack.
Of course, you did not expect it to be discussed in the public forums.
And of course, you failed utterly to comprehend why you were attacked, or to even understand basic timing, marking, sequencing, and attack payloads.
You still fail to do so.
That's OK, its no slight against you.
You only make it a slight, when you claim to be more than you "are".
You make a claim, want to project a "persona", yet the facts contradict it.
And that frustrates you.
I'll give you a day or two to look at it more, and google the .Net worlds to try and understand your repeated errors of the most basic type.
Later, if you and Sara still cant figure it out, I'll post it and the explanation for you.