DeletedUser
Guest
Sure, I believe it is NoMo's turn to retaliate, but to put us on a level playing field give us fair warning of your claims and op details too : )
DeletedUser173
Guest
Level playing field? Last I checked...
Storm - 13.519.805
S2orm - 7.907.967
ISDC - 5.851.816
---------------------
27.279.588 points VS 8.247.627 points.
Tell you what, if you want to fight a tribe 1/3 the size of your alliance, don't even try to bring up that "level playing field" crap. :smack:
Storm - 13.519.805
S2orm - 7.907.967
ISDC - 5.851.816
---------------------
27.279.588 points VS 8.247.627 points.
Tell you what, if you want to fight a tribe 1/3 the size of your alliance, don't even try to bring up that "level playing field" crap. :smack:
DeletedUser
Guest
This is just the begging of what should be a long war, this is just one op, just a start, people should just let this play its way out, and as much as I love the externals being used, they shouldn't be used in this way in my opinion. I think this should be a place for some non biased evaluations of what is going on in game, maybe with a little chest bumping mixed in, and more lively chat than this taunting, or whatever it is.
DeletedUser3141
Guest
What makes you think it made any difference?
At the distance sent it's easy to tell real nobles from fakes so the real targets were easy to identify. Coming right on the heels of an op from ISDC though added some complexity.
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser3141
Guest
Well it's hard to be unbiased but I do believe that denigrating your opponent is not a good strategy.
After all if you win then you have more to take pride in if your opponent is good and if you lose then it's more embarrassing if you've been saying how bad they are.
In all honesty both sides have some good people and some not so good. Also some are more pleasant and more fun to deal with than others.
I certainly agree that some more good natured banter would make the forums more fun ... for me at least. It's also a lot easier to acknowledge your opponents good points if they are treating you with respect.
DeletedUser
Guest
I could not agree more. =)
DeletedUser
Guest
Well now it`s time for the Real war, hopefully this will kick up the externals.
DeletedUser
Guest
Hmmm Dase you backed off a bit it seems, told ya not to be arrogant it just makes you look bad
DeletedUser
Guest
XKillzone - you might want to check those stats again.
And it both sad and funny that you guys tossed out poor KING ALMIGHTY.
And it both sad and funny that you guys tossed out poor KING ALMIGHTY.
DeletedUser3141
Guest
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. You launched a big op and succeeded in taking some villages. How many relative to the size of the attack has not been stated. Nor is it over since you need to not only take but hold.
As for the rest ... well inactive players are booted or nobled ... or both. Exactly what and when depends on circumstances but you seem to be implying that we booted an active player. Nobody active and trying to defend themselves gets booted no matter what it does to the stats.
It's been difficult for several of our members who lost troops defending the recent op by ISDC and haven't had time to replace them. So really not a lot to gloat about.
Actually given the balance of numbers and forces the fact that most no longer seem to expect NoMo to collapse immediately I would say is something of a compliment even if perhaps (or perhaps not) unintentional.
As for the rest ... well inactive players are booted or nobled ... or both. Exactly what and when depends on circumstances but you seem to be implying that we booted an active player. Nobody active and trying to defend themselves gets booted no matter what it does to the stats.
It's been difficult for several of our members who lost troops defending the recent op by ISDC and haven't had time to replace them. So really not a lot to gloat about.
Actually given the balance of numbers and forces the fact that most no longer seem to expect NoMo to collapse immediately I would say is something of a compliment even if perhaps (or perhaps not) unintentional.
DeletedUser173
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
You and your council should share those internals with the rest of storm
DeletedUser
Guest
You mean these? From TWStats? This is from the time you guys declared on us.
Side 1:
Tribes: STORM, S²ORM
Side 2:
Tribes: NoMo
Timeframe: 17/08/2012 16:18:54 to 18/08/2012 20:47:43
Total conquers:
Side 1: 65
Side 2: 32
Difference: 33
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 28
Side 2: 15
Difference: 13
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 506,412
Side 2: 242,923
Difference: 263,489
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 251,454
Side 2: 129,160
Difference: 122,294
DeletedUser
Guest
Quite the achievement there you`re beating a tribe less then half the size of your "Alliance" by 13 caps
DeletedUser
Guest
Menace, all those stats say is that an op, with supposedly every storm/s2orm member involved, that involved several hundred trains, managed to take (and hold- so far) 13 villages. Idk what you're bragging about... LOL
DeletedUser173
Guest
No, actually I was referring to...
If you had known how to use twstats, you would know that he flatlined over a week ago, meaning that he went red inactive. Now I undrstand you're upset that your op failed [miserably], but do you really think bragging about nobling inactives is gonna make you look any better?
DeletedUser
Guest
Mash - you know that not every member was involved. I am not sure why you would say that. We WANTED every member involved, but as of the circular today we had 30-some members with no war stats.
I am not bragging - I was told that the OP would get us no villages. It did. I am pointing that out. That is all.
I am not bragging - I was told that the OP would get us no villages. It did. I am pointing that out. That is all.
DeletedUser
Guest
Congrats you got 13 villages from 200 trains, want a medal?